|
(Created page with "{{SKOS Concept |Context=Expertise Management Method (EMM) |broader=EMontPatterns }} {{Beeldmateriaal show}} {{SKOS Concept secondary}} CTF is an acronym for: Control, transfo...")
|
k
|
||
| Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
{{SKOS Concept |
{{SKOS Concept |
||
| − | |Context=Expertise Management Method (EMM) |
+ | |Context=Expertise Management Method (EMM) |
| − | |broader= |
+ | |broader=EMontPattern
|
}} |
}} |
||
{{Beeldmateriaal show}} |
{{Beeldmateriaal show}} |
||
Versie van 4 mrt 2014 om 15:47
Eigenschappen
| Context | Expertise Management Method (EMM) |
|---|---|
| prefLabel | |
| altLabel | |
| hiddenLabel | |
| inScheme | |
| subject | |
| broader | EMontPattern |
| narrower | |
| partOf | |
| association | |
| related | |
| creator |
De View-Navigation (VN) pagina's.
Er zijn geen VN pagina's gelinkt.
CTF is an acronym for: Control, transform, facilitate. This entails the following: Certain input is given to a process, which is then transformed to output. To facilitate this transformation, certain resources are needed. To make sure that this transformation and facilitation is going according to plan, there will be control over the process. CTF is a method that is used to structure and store this vital information.
While a standalone CTF implementation is already good in its own rights, it gets even better when combined with other patterns. Other patterns that work extremely well with CTF are, among others, PQR and PDCA. The PQR is a great addition to the ‘transform’ aspect of the CTF, seeing as the PQR method is designed to provide suitable actions for certain conditions.
The PDCA method is suitable to be implemented in the ‘control’ aspect of the CTF method. PDCA, which means: ‘Plan, do, check, act’. It is a cyclic method for continuous improvement, which is ideal for a controlling process such as the one in CTF. A diagram portraying the combination of CTF and PDCA would look like the illustration below, as shown, the PDCA and the CTF make a great combination, allowing for better governance.
<<insert image>>
Thus one of the characteristics of the CTF method is that other methods can easily entwine with CTF, with emphasis on PQR and PDCA. Another great combination with CTF is CTF itself, a CTF block can be placed inside another CTF block, providing the wanted level of depth. Those levels of depths can create difficulties when visualizing the graph; it could become confusing when too many levels are present. A few examples of visualizations that would support such in-depth (recursive) hierarchies are:
<<insert image>>
As shown in the figure, this method of visualizing the recursion basically knows no limits, except for the height of the screen of course. It will be a lot harder when other patterns are involved, but that’s not the case right now.
